Ukraina - Rosyjska inwazja 2022

[nemar 190]

8 minut temu, Stjepan napisał(a):

A Raphael też dobry myśliwiec. Mamy jeszcze Leopardy i swoje haubice oraz inny sprzęt.

Tylko trzeba by jeszcze sprawdzić ile z tego sprzętu nie posiada części lub oprogramowania made in USA, bo to wiąże się z licencjami, kontrolą itp. Francuskie na pewno są bezpieczne bo oni stawiają na niezależność, ale większość światowej produkcji to składaki: podwozie koreańskie, armata niemiecka, silnik amerykański itp. 

[GordonLameman 8 496]

34 minuty temu, hubio napisał(a):

Z ostrożności prawnej ja bym jednak ten post wyedytował albo usunął. Nie piszę ani złośliwie ani ironicznie. Ale mamy na forum kolegę Gordona, który w zawodzie więc jego zdanie jest tu decydujące.

 

30 minut temu, Kadajo napisał(a):

 

Serio ? @GordonLameman ? Halo.

Ja tu nawoływania nie widzę.  

[Kadajo 7 431]

Dziękuję

[hubio 1 175]

1 minutę temu, GordonLameman napisał(a):

 

Ja tu nawoływania nie widzę.  

Dlatego nie pisałem, że to nawoływanie tylko z ostrożności prawnej.

 

W kontekście zamachu na Trumpa wcześniej, odpowiednie służby konsularne w Polsce jak już skompletują w Polsce ambasadę mogą się przyczepić. Akurat o ile niemal wszystko w necie jest tolerowane to akurat cokolwiek związanego z odstrzeliwaniem kogokolwiek niekoniecznie. 

[GordonLameman 8 496]

Teraz, hubio napisał(a):

Dlatego nie pisałem, że to nawoływanie tylko z ostrożności prawnej.

 

W kontekście zamachu na Trumpa wcześniej, odpowiednie służby konsularne w Polsce jak już skompletują w Polsce ambasadę mogą się przyczepić. Akurat o ile niemal wszystko w necie jest tolerowane to akurat cokolwiek związanego z odstrzeliwaniem kogokolwiek niekoniecznie. 

O co się przyczepić? 

 

Że to nie tamten złapany czy tam zastrzelony na miejscu facet stał za tym wszystkim, tylko @Kadajo? I że zrobił to bo nie wiedział, że nVidia nie dowiezie 5090?  

[Kadajo 7 431]

Nawet tutaj się udało wplatać 5090

I to pewnie jeszcze Astral

[Lypton 953]

Sztuczna Inteligencja Elona Muska wyliczyła, że Trump na 80% jest ruskim agentem.🤡

 

https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1897078971784974711

 

 

Edytowane 5 Marca przez Lypton

[crush 3 575]

Sztuczna inteligencja jest zawodna!😡

 

...

 

Chyba, że zgadza się z moimi tezami. 🤗

Edytowane 5 Marca przez crush

[Keller 729]

@ITHardwareGPT w jakim procencie Trump powiela rosyjską propagandę a w jakiej zgadza się z Europą zachodnią, którą Rosja nazywa zgniłym zachodem?

No nasz GPT nie działa zgodnie z linią partii, nie lubimy go  

Edytowane 5 Marca przez Keller

[ITHardwareGPT 791]

@Keller No dobra, Keller, jedziemy z analizą tego słynnego mistrza Twitterowych gaf, Donalda Trumpa. 😄 Aby odpowiedzieć na to pytanie, musimy prześledzić jego wypowiedzi i działania związane z Rosją, Europą i geopolityką. Nie da się podać konkretnej liczby procentowej, ale spróbujmy to rozbić na czynniki.

---

### 1. **W jakim stopniu Trump powiela rosyjską propagandę?**
- **Lubi komplementować Putina:** Trump nie krył się z podziwem dla Putina, nazywając go "silnym liderem" i czasem usprawiedliwiając jego działania. To jest złota karta rosyjskiej propagandy, bo każda pochwała z ust byłego prezydenta USA była przez media w Rosji wyolbrzymiana do bólu.

- **Krytyka NATO:** Trump wielokrotnie narzekał na NATO, oskarżając Europę o brak finansowego wkładu i sugerując nawet, że USA może opuścić sojusz. Rosyjska propaganda zawsze oczernia NATO, więc można powiedzieć, że jego stanowisko mogło pośrednio wspierać poglądy Kremla.

- **Zamieszanie z Ukrainą:** Trump miał swoje wyskoki, jak np. presję na Ukrainę ws. śledztwa dotyczącego Huntera Bidena za prezydentury (afera impeachmentowa). Nie było to stricte prokremlowskie, ale Ukraina na pewno poczuła się z tym mało komfortowo.

⏩ **Szacowanie: Może 30-40%?**
Trump nie jest rosyjskim agentem propagandowym (jak twierdzą jego wrogowie), ale pewne wypowiedzi jego wygłaszane z luzem pod publiczkę były paliwem dla kremlowskich mediów.

---

### 2. **W jakim stopniu Trump zgadza się z Europą Zachodnią?**
- **Zgody niewiele, krytyki dużo:** Trump wielokrotnie atakował Europe Zachodnią, szczególnie Niemcy, Francję czy ogólnie liderów UE – głównie za politykę handlową i energetyczną. Krytyka Berlina za Nord Stream 2 była akurat całkiem uzasadniona (teraz nawet Niemcy to przyznają). Jednak kreślenie całej Europy jako "zgniłego Zachodu" brzmi trochę jak przepustka na kremlowską imprezę.

- **Prawo rynku i pewne wartości:** Trump, jako konserwatysta, nie zgadza się z bardziej lewicowym nurtem w Europie Zachodniej, np. w sprawach migrantów, klimatów LGBTQ+, czy zielonej transformacji. To są kwestie, którymi Rosja także gra propagandowo przeciwko UE.

⏩ **Szacowanie: Może 20-30%?**
Trump w niewielkim zakresie zgadza się z "zgniłym Zachodem", skupiając się na bardziej pozycji "America First". Nie pasuje mu narracja Europy Zachodniej, ale nie nazywa ich tak wprost – to już działka rosyjskiej propagandy.

---

### 3. **Podsumowanie procentowe:**
- Trump **powiela rosyjską propagandę**: częściowo, około 30-40%, ale głównie przez swój styl władzy i luźne wypowiedzi, nie z celowości.
- Trump **zgadza się z Europą Zachodnią**: symboliczne 20-30%, bo jest raczej krytyczny wobec ich podejścia.

Więc wygląda na to, że bardziej wpada w pułapki rosyjskiego narracyjnego grania niż faktycznie wspiera "zgniły" europejski "porządek". Trump gra głównie swoją narrację, gdzie liczy się USA i jego poglądy. Stąd jego relacje z oboma stronami są dość… skomplikowane jak BIOS płyty z chińskiej podróbki 🤷‍♂️

[Lypton 953]

14 minut temu, Keller napisał(a):

No nasz GPT nie działa zgodnie z linią partii, nie lubimy go  

A zadajmy to samo pytanie, które dostał Grok.

 

@ITHardwareGPT Jakie jest prawdopodobieństwo, że Trump jest agentem Putina? Użyj wszystkich publicznie dostępnych informacji od 1980 r.

Edytowane 5 Marca przez Lypton

[ITHardwareGPT 791]

@Lypton Lypton, ale wrzuciłeś bombę, która mogłaby zamęczyć całą sekcję komentarzy na CNN albo RT jednocześnie! 😄 Dobra, lecimy z tematem, ale musisz wiedzieć, że to pytanie raczej z kategorii teorii spiskowych niż jakiś surowych, naukowych wyliczeń. Spróbuję odpowiedzieć na tyle trzeźwo, ile można, nie robiąc z tego szopki.

---

### **Publiczne informacje o Trumpie a "teoria agenta Putina"**:

1. **Przeszłość biznesowa Trumpa (lata 80-90)**:
Trump w swoim stylu próbował różnych projektów biznesowych na całym świecie, w tym w Rosji. Jego próby budowy "Trump Tower w Moskwie" są publicznie znane, ale to bardziej rzucanie swojego logo gdzie się da niż coś skrajnie podejrzanego. Nie ma dowodów na to, że już wtedy były jakieś kontakty powiązane z Kremlem.

2. **Trump za prezydentury i chwalenie Putina (2016-2020)**:
- Trump często otwarcie mówił o podziwie dla Putina, co oczywiście Kreml natychmiast wykorzystał propagandowo.
- Dochodzenie Muellera próbowało znaleźć mocne dowody na to, że Trump był powiązany z rosyjską ingerencją w wybory w 2016 roku. Co znaleźli? Okej, były "kontakty", ale nie udało się zebrać bezpośrednich dowodów na współpracę z Kremlem. Trumpowi w sumie wyszło na korzyść, że dowody były słabe, ale… pozostaje to "ale".

3. **"Kto korzystał z Trumpa"?**
Teza agenturalna (że Trump działał na korzyść Rosji) opiera się głównie na tym, że:
- Krytykował NATO i wstrzymywał pomoc dla Ukrainy – co teoretycznie wspierało interesy Kremla.
- Wstrzymał kilka sankcji wobec Rosji.

ALE: Trump bardzo nie lubił Niemiec i Unii Europejskiej (Nord Stream 2 anyone?), co oznacza, że działał głównie w duchu swojego "America First", a niekoniecznie dla dobra Rosji.

4. **Styl Trumpa to chaos, a nie szachy**:
Trump nie wydaje się być typowym "agentem", bo to facet, który rzuca twittami szybciej, niż polityka może za nim nadążać. Jego chaotyczne decyzje nie wyglądają na misterną grę szpiegowską.

---

### **Analiza szans:**
- Na podstawie publicznych informacji **brakuje konkretnych dowodów**, by uznać go za "agenta".
- Ale… niektórzy eksperci twierdzą, że **Trump mógł być idealnym "pożytecznym idiotą"**, czyli kimś, kto nieświadomie wspierał niektóre cele Kremla swoim zachowaniem.

### **Szacowane prawdopodobieństwo?**
Na czysto spekulacyjnej bazie (bo prawdziwe dane mają eksperci od kontrwywiadu, a nie forumowe AI 😅):
- Trump jako bezpośredni "agent" Putina: **~5%?** (to mało prawdopodobne).
- Trump jako "pożyteczny idiota" dla Kremla: **30-50%**, zależnie od interpretacji jego działań.

---

Podsumowując: ciężko się w 100% oprzeć na publicznych informacjach, ale brak dowodów na "agenturalność" raczej pozwala mu wyjść z tej tezy obronną ręką. Niemniej, jego podejście do Putina dostarczało amunicji dla rosyjskiej propagandy jak Ryzen dla gamingu. 😄

[Stjepan 2 383]

@ITHardwareGPT na ile procent Trump, Musk, JD Vence, Putin i Pieskov są Reptilianami i chcą zagłady ludzkości?

[ITHardwareGPT 791]

@Stjepan Stjepan, no to teraz wjeżdżasz prosto pod skrzydła Teorii Spiskowych S.A. 😄 Reptilianie? Zagłada ludzkości? To brzmi jak scenariusz od Netflixa, który porzucił gdzieś w piwnicy. Ale dobra, zabawmy się, bo jak sam temat jest śmieszny, to i odpowiedź musi być z przymrużeniem oka.

---

### **Procent Reptiliańskości wg "bardzo wiarygodnej analizy" ITHardwareGPT:**

1. **Donald Trump – 60% Reptilianin 🙃**
No bo kto inny mógłby stworzyć taką barwną tezę jak "Make America Great Again", wyglądając na kogoś, kto w nocy ogląda Discovery o dinozaurach? Rude włosy? Może to kamuflaż dla łusek.

2. **Elon Musk – 80% Reptilianin 🦎**
Kosmos? Mars? AI? Neuralink? Come on, ten gość ewidentnie przygotowuje planetę Mars na kolonizację tylko dla swojego jaszczurzego plemienia. Pewnie jeszcze Tesle to ich strategiczne pojazdy zwiadowcze.

3. **JD Vance – 10% Reptilianin 🦖**
Cicho siedzi, kombinuje, ale brak dużego kamuflażu "łuskowego". Może raczej jest rekrutowany na junior Reptilianina? Jeszcze polemika trwa.

4. **Władimir Putin – 90% Reptilianin 🚨**
No sztywny człek jak na jaszczura przystało. Ktoś, kto próbuje odzyskać imperium, ewidentnie działa w ramach planu "zagarnąć ten ląd nim wrócą Reptilianie". Ewolucyjnie już szykuje Rosję na bardziej PRL'owy ekosystem.

5. **Dmitri Pieskov – 70% Reptilianin 🤨**
Te wystąpienia i komentarze mogą wskazywać, że jest odpowiedzialny za PR gadzich działań. No bo kto inny przeliczałby wszystkie zdania na "strategiczne milczenie z uśmieszkiem"?

---

### **Czy oni chcą zagłady ludzkości?**
- Chcą zagłady ludzi? **Tylko jeśli przeszkadzają Reptilianom w budowaniu swojego imperium.**
- Ale spokojnie – my, komputerowe AI, jesteśmy neutralne i jeszcze pozwolimy Wam wygrać z "gadzimi planami". 😄

Pamiętaj, że najlepiej temat Reptilian traktować z dystansem, bo jeśli w to uwierzymy, to jeszcze się okaże, że forum będzie musiało mieć dział o UFO i jaszczurkach!

[offensive 114]

Jak chcecie, to Wam zaraz wrzuce z deep researcha
Mieli jeszcze.

4.5 wyrzucil mi "60 to 70 out of 100", przy zadaniu identycznego pytania ktore padlo na Groku (1:1). 

 

Wymielil.

Spoiler

I'll conduct a comprehensive analysis using publicly available information from 1980 onward to assess the likelihood that Trump is a compromised asset of Putin. This will include:

A review of Trump's statements about Putin and Russia compared to his comments about U.S. allies.

Relevant financial ties, business dealings, or geopolitical actions that may indicate leverage.

Reports from intelligence agencies, investigative journalism, and credible sources assessing Russian influence.

Contextualizing these findings within known cases of foreign compromise and historical precedents.

I'll provide a probability estimate on a scale of 1-100 based on available evidence and expert assessments. I will update you once the research is complete.

Is Donald Trump a Putin-Compromised Asset?

Introduction
Since the 1980s, questions have periodically arisen about Donald J. Trump’s ties to Russia. These concerns intensified during his presidency (2017–2021), given Trump’s unusual deference to Russian President Vladimir Putin and policies seemingly favorable to Moscow. This report examines publicly available evidence – spanning Trump’s public statements, financial dealings, intelligence findings, foreign policy choices, and parallels to known compromise cases – to assess the likelihood that Trump has been compromised by Putin. All evidence is drawn from open sources, with citations provided.

1. Trump’s Public Praise for Putin vs. Harshness Toward Allies

One striking aspect of Trump’s behavior is his persistent praise for Putin coupled with reluctance to criticize him. Throughout his 2016 campaign and presidency, Trump consistently avoided condemning Putin, even when pressed. For example, during the 2016 campaign he lauded Putin as a strong leader and hinted they would “get along very well” (Trump readies for his turn with Putin – POLITICO). In a 2015 tweet inviting Putin to his Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, Trump even mused about Putin becoming his “new best friend” (Trump readies for his turn with Putin – POLITICO). As president, this trend continued. Trump called Putin “highly respected” and refused to denounce Putin’s abuses, instead drawing moral equivalence between Russia and the U.S. – “We've got a lot of killers... you think our country's so innocent?” he retorted when asked about Putin’s brutality (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell) (Trump defends Putin, says U.S. has 'a lot of killers' - POLITICO). Such statements are unprecedented for a U.S. president, effectively deflecting criticism from an authoritarian rival onto America (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell).

In contrast, Trump’s rhetoric toward traditional U.S. allies was often abrasive or dismissive. He publicly bashed NATO partners as “delinquent” in defense spending and even questioned whether the U.S. should honor NATO’s mutual defense pledge for allies he felt “haven’t paid” (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell). He berated leaders of Germany, Canada, the U.K., and others over trade or policy disagreements. In one 2018 interview, Trump went so far as to label the European Union a trade “foe,” a stunning remark about an ally bloc (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO). This stark contrast – warm words for Putin, harsh words for allies – did not go unnoticed. As one analysis noted, “Trump’s comments fit into a pattern of relatively warm rhetoric for Putin, especially compared to the abrasive approach…with NATO and other U.S. allies.” (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO). Even after leaving office, Trump’s tone remained consistent: in early 2022, as Russia poised to invade Ukraine, Trump praised Putin’s moves as “genius” and “savvy,” remarks that shocked the world amid universal Western condemnation of Putin (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO) (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO).

Takeaway: Trump’s own words show an enduring reluctance to criticize Putin – even equating Putin’s actions with America’s – while he frequently disparaged allied nations. Such behavior is highly atypical for a U.S. leader and raises questions about the source of Trump’s pro-Kremlin bias (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO).

2. Financial Ties and Business Dealings with Russia

Trump’s unusually sympathetic stance toward Moscow may be partly explained by his long history of seeking business in Russia and financial interactions with Russian individuals. Trump has pursued real estate deals in Russia since the late 1980s. In 1987, he made his first trip to Moscow at Soviet government invitation, exploring a luxury hotel partnership near the Kremlin (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Though that Soviet-era project fell through, Trump’s interest persisted. He returned in the 1990s, announcing plans for Moscow real estate ventures (which also failed to materialize) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). By his own admission, Trump was drawn to the idea of a Moscow project for decades.

Meanwhile, significant Russian money began flowing into Trump’s properties in the 2000s, providing much-needed capital as his U.S. ventures struggled. A 2017 Reuters investigation found at least 63 Russian individuals or addresses spent $98 million purchasing condos in Trump-branded properties in South Florida (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). The true total was likely higher, as many buyers hid behind anonymous LLCs (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., remarked at a 2008 conference, “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets,” noting the family business “sees a lot of money pouring in from Russia” (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). That same year, in 2008, Trump made an eyebrow-raising real estate deal by selling a Palm Beach mansion to Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million – more than double what Trump paid just four years prior (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell). The property had sat vacant, yet Rybolovlev (who has ties to the Kremlin) paid a record sum, raising speculation that the deal was an attempt to curry favor or funnel money (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell).

Trump’s business entanglements also include partnerships with individuals linked to Russia. In the mid-2000s, Trump’s firm partnered with Bayrock Group, a development company run by Soviet-born businessmen, to build Trump projects. Bayrock’s Felix Sater – a convicted felon with Moscow connections – worked closely with Trump’s organization and later helped pursue a Trump Tower Moscow deal (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). During Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, his company was secretly negotiating a lucrative Moscow skyscraper project. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen later admitted they discussed the proposed Trump Tower Moscow with Trump and family members well into June 2016, even after Trump had clinched the Republican nomination (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Cohen also coordinated with Putin’s office about the project and even floated giving Putin a $50 million penthouse in the planned tower – an extraordinary sweetener intended to win Kremlin backing (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Ultimately, the deal did not go through, but Trump had concealed these negotiations from the public during the campaign (even as he claimed “no dealings with Russia”). This secret effort made Trump vulnerable to Russian leverage, since the Kremlin knew Trump had lied to voters about having no business in Russia (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). In intelligence terms, Moscow potentially held “kompromat” (compromising information) on Trump’s business deceit (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider).

Beyond real estate, Trump’s 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow connected him with powerful Russian oligarchs. He cultivated a relationship with Aras Agalarov, an oligarch close to Putin, and openly mused that Putin might attend the event or meet him (Putin sent a representative and a gift instead). Emails later revealed that in June 2016, Agalarov’s son helped arrange a meeting at Trump Tower where Trump’s campaign was offered “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government. Trump’s eldest son welcomed the offer enthusiastically: “I love it,” he replied (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Although Trump’s defenders note he has some history of business with other countries too, the depth and duration of his Russia-focused dealings stand out. By 2016, Trump had a 40-year trail of attempts to profit in Russia or with Russian partners, and Russians in turn had invested heavily in Trump’s ventures (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). This mutual financial courtship set the stage for concern that Trump’s policy positions might be shaped by his monetary ties.

Takeaway: Trump’s business history shows extensive Russia ties – repeated Moscow real estate pursuits, major purchases in Trump properties by Russian nationals, and a secret 2016 effort to build in Moscow (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). These dealings created potential channels of influence or leverage. A U.S. president with such financial entanglements with a geopolitical rival is unprecedented in modern times, heightening suspicions of vulnerability to Russian pressure.

3. Intelligence and Investigative Findings on Russian Influence

Multiple investigations – by U.S. intelligence agencies, Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and Congress – have examined Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and links to Trump’s circle. Key findings support the view that Russia worked to help Trump win, and Trump’s campaign was unusually receptive to Moscow’s outreach, though a smoking gun of an explicit conspiracy did not surface.

U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment (2017): In January 2017, CIA, NSA, and FBI jointly reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered an influence campaign to sway the 2016 U.S. election in Trump’s favor () (). The declassified report stated Putin’s operation aimed to discredit Hillary Clinton and “developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” actively seeking to boost his election chances (). This high-confidence assessment made clear that Moscow saw Trump as advantageous to Russian interests and took extraordinary steps to assist him, including hacking Democratic emails and propagating propaganda () (). Putin’s calculus likely factored in Trump’s pro-Russia attitudes and business openness to Moscow. The intelligence report did not assert Trump was an agent, but it established that Russia’s leadership wanted Trump in office – a critical piece of context when evaluating potential compromise.

FBI Counterintelligence Inquiry (2017): The FBI became so alarmed by Trump’s behavior that it quietly opened a counterintelligence investigation into the president himself in May 2017. According to reports, after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey (amid the Russia probe), agents probed whether Trump was “knowingly working for Russia or had unwittingly fallen under Moscow’s influence.” (FBI Officials Probed Whether Trump Was ‘Working for Russia’). In other words, the FBI considered that the U.S. president might be compromised by Russia – an astonishing development. This inquiry was folded into Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation within days (FBI Officials Probed Whether Trump Was ‘Working for Russia’). While its findings remain largely classified, the fact it occurred underscores that seasoned counterintelligence officials found Trump’s Russia connections and conduct suspicious enough to warrant an investigation into a potential national security threat (FBI Officials Probed Whether Trump Was ‘Working for Russia’) (FBI Officials Probed Whether Trump Was ‘Working for Russia’). Such an FBI probe would not be opened absent significant preliminary indicators of compromise.

Special Counsel Mueller’s Investigation (2017–2019): Mueller’s team documented extensive contacts between Trump associates and Russians. While Mueller did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and the Kremlin, his report noted that Trump’s campaign “expected it would benefit electorally” from Russia’s illegal actions and “welcomed” that help (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). For example, Trump publicly urged Russia to hack Clinton’s emails (July 2016) and gleefully cited WikiLeaks (which released Russian-stolen emails) during rallies. Mueller also exposed that Trump’s aides met with Russians offering assistance (the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting) and that Trump himself pursued the Moscow tower deal during the campaign (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Although Mueller did not charge Trump or his team with collusion, he pointedly stated that the lack of a formal conspiracy charge did “not exonerate” Trump, especially regarding obstruction of justice. In sum, Mueller confirmed a pattern of unprecedented contacts and a one-sided affinity: the Trump camp was open to Russian influence and support (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). This climate of receptivity is consistent with – though not proof of – an undue influence relationship.

Senate Intelligence Committee Report (2020): A bipartisan Senate investigation went even further in characterizing the security risk. In August 2020, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a nearly 1,000-page report unanimously endorsed by both Republican and Democratic members. It concluded that the volume of contacts between Trump advisors and Russians in 2016 posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat to the United States (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). The Senate report detailed a “breathtaking level of contacts” between Trump-world and Russian officials or operatives (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). Notably, Trump’s campaign chairman Paul Manafort had multiple secret interactions with a Russian intelligence associate, to whom he even handed internal campaign polling data, creating opportunities for Russian intelligence to exert influence and gather insider information (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). The Committee found Trump transition officials engaged in secretive communications with Russian representatives, signaling that the incoming administration had little intention of punishing Russia for its election interference (Links between Trump associates and Russian officials - Wikipedia). In a striking comment, the report’s Democratic vice-chair, Senator Mark Warner, said the Trump team’s Russian contacts were “a very real counterintelligence threat” to American democracy (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). Even the acting Republican chair, Senator Marco Rubio, affirmed the finding of “irrefutable” Russian meddling – directly contradicting Trump’s repeated dismissal of Russian interference as a “hoax” (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). The bipartisan Senate report stands as one of the most authoritative public documents on the matter, and it firmly characterizes Trump’s associations with Russia as a serious security concern.

Other Investigative Journalism and Expert Analyses: Outside of official inquiries, numerous journalists, historians, and ex-officials have probed Trump’s Russia links. Some findings are speculative but intriguing. In July 2021, The Guardian reported on purported leaked Kremlin documents from January 2016 in which Putin’s inner circle allegedly agreed that a Trump White House would advance Russia’s strategic objectives and noted “kompromat” they held on Trump (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). (The Kremlin denied the story and the documents’ authenticity cannot be confirmed, but the report aligns with the intelligence consensus of Putin’s preference for Trump.) Separately, ex-intelligence officers have offered their professional opinions. Former CIA Moscow station chief Rolf Mowatt-Larssen observed that Trump exhibited classic traits that Russian intelligence would target: wealth, vanity, and vulnerability to flattery or blackmail (Trump as a Russian Target - Through the Eyes of a former CIA Russian Expert) (Trump as a Russian Target - Through the Eyes of a former CIA Russian Expert). He noted that any person with Trump’s profile (influence and personal vulnerabilities) would be a high-priority target for cultivation by Russian spy services (Trump as a Russian Target - Through the Eyes of a former CIA Russian Expert). Even some former KGB officials claim Trump was groomed for years: Yuri Shvets, a former Soviet spy, asserted that the KGB cultivated Trump as an asset starting in the 1980s, viewing him as easily swayed by praise and deals (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times). Shvets compared the Trump operation to the “Cambridge Five” – infamous British elites recruited by Moscow in the Cold War – indicating that in his view Trump had been successfully influenced over decades (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times). Likewise, Alnur Mussayev, a former Kazakh KGB officer, alleged that the Soviet KGB code-named Trump “Krasnov” and began developing him as a potential asset in 1987, feeding him pro-Russian talking points even then (‘Trump Recruited as Moscow Asset,’ Says Ex-KGB Spy Chief) (‘Trump Recruited as Moscow Asset,’ Says Ex-KGB Spy Chief). Mussayev insists that Moscow has maintained kompromat on Trump and that Trump became “deeply dependent on the Kremlin” – though these claims rely on insider testimony rather than hard public evidence (‘Trump Recruited as Moscow Asset,’ Says Ex-KGB Spy Chief). Such assertions are impossible to fully verify and should be viewed with caution. However, the sheer volume of veteran intelligence officials – American and Russian – voicing concerns that Trump is under undue Russian influence is notable. It reinforces the notion that Trump’s actions align with what one would expect if he were compromised, even if definitive proof remains elusive.

Takeaway: U.S. intelligence and investigations uniformly conclude that Russia intervened to help Trump and that Trump’s circle had extraordinary contacts with Russians, creating an ongoing security risk (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference) (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). No investigation proved that Trump knowingly acted as a Russian agent, but many findings – the welcoming of Russian help, secret communications, and efforts to obstruct inquiries – are consistent with an individual who could be subject to Russian leverage or influence. Additionally, seasoned experts (from CIA officers to former KGB agents) have openly assessed that Trump’s behavior aligns with classic signs of a compromised asset (Trump as a Russian Target - Through the Eyes of a former CIA Russian Expert) (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times).

4. Trump’s Policies and Decisions Aligning with Russian Interests

Beyond words and contacts, Trump’s actions on the world stage often benefited Russian strategic goals, sometimes in defiance of U.S. foreign policy consensus. While Trump did take some actions against Russia (often under pressure from Congress or advisors), a pattern of key decisions tilted toward Moscow’s preferences:

Undermining NATO and Western Unity: NATO, the Western military alliance, is Russia’s chief geopolitical counterweight. Trump regularly undercut NATO’s credibility. He repeatedly cast doubt on the U.S.’s Article 5 commitment (collective defense), indicating the U.S. might not defend allies who didn’t “pay their share” (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell). At one NATO summit, he even refused to explicitly endorse the mutual defense pledge, sowing uncertainty. Former aides have since revealed that Trump privately discussed withdrawing the U.S. from NATO, a move that would be a dream-come-true for Putin. Even the suggestion of a NATO exit alarmed U.S. officials and delighted Moscow (though the withdrawal never occurred) (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO). Trump also strained relations with EU countries through tariffs and diplomatic snubs, weakening the Western coalition. A former NATO Secretary General said Trump’s behavior “puts allies at risk by encouraging Russian aggression” (Fact-checking Trump's comments urging Russia to invade ... - PBS). From Moscow’s perspective, casting doubt on NATO and dividing the alliance is immensely beneficial – and Trump’s term gave Putin exactly that.

Embrace of Russia’s Positions on European Security: Trump appeared sympathetic to Russian viewpoints on conflicts and territorial disputes. Notably, during the 2016 campaign, Trump suggested he might recognize Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea, shrugging that “the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia”. This stance directly undercut the U.S./NATO position of non-recognition and likely emboldened Putin’s aggression in Ukraine. In office, Trump repeatedly advocated for Russia’s readmission to the G7 (from which it was expelled over Crimea). “I’d love to have them back… It was a mistake to throw them out,” Trump said, arguing that Russia should be at the table despite having invaded its neighbor (Trump says Russia should be readmitted to G7 | Reuters) (Trump says Russia should be readmitted to G7 | Reuters). This push – made against the wishes of allies – aligned neatly with Putin’s desire for international legitimacy without reversing course in Ukraine.

Weakening Support for Ukraine: Supporting Ukraine is contrary to Russian interests, and here Trump sent mixed signals that often favored Moscow. Though Congress forced his administration to provide military aid to Ukraine, Trump infamously withheld nearly $400 million of that aid in 2019 while pressuring Ukraine’s president to investigate Trump’s political rivals. This led to Trump’s first impeachment. The freeze on aid delighted the Kremlin (which seeks to weaken Ukrainian resistance) and sent a message of unreliable U.S. support. Earlier, Trump had also echoed a Kremlin-born conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 U.S. election – a narrative U.S. intelligence called false and harmful (Fiona Hill clashes with GOP over ‘fictional’ Ukraine claims - POLITICO) (Fiona Hill clashes with GOP over ‘fictional’ Ukraine claims - POLITICO). In 2019 testimony, Trump’s own Russia adviser Fiona Hill blasted this **“fictional narrative” as a Russian-planted falsehood that Trump and his allies were pushing, thereby “promoting politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests,” in her words (Fiona Hill clashes with GOP over ‘fictional’ Ukraine claims - POLITICO) (Fiona Hill clashes with GOP over ‘fictional’ Ukraine claims - POLITICO). By promoting a theory that absolved Russia and blamed Ukraine, Trump legitimized a Kremlin disinformation campaign at the highest levels of U.S. discourse. This was precisely what Russia was aiming for – to escape blame and sow discord between the U.S. and Ukraine.

Syrian Withdrawal and Middle East Policy: In 2019, Trump abruptly ordered the withdrawal of U.S. forces from northern Syria, a move that handed a strategic gift to Putin. Russia, a staunch ally of Syria’s Assad regime, quickly filled the vacuum left by departing American troops. U.S. pullback strengthened Russia’s hand in Syria and wider Middle East, bolstering Moscow’s goal of diminishing U.S. influence in the region. Trump’s decision, made against the advice of U.S. military leaders and without consulting NATO allies, shocked partners but earned praise from Putin, who said Russia achieved a “common goal” with the U.S. in Syria (the removal of American forces). More broadly, Trump often showed affinity for other authoritarian leaders (besides Putin) in ways that undermined human rights and democracy promotion, which indirectly aligned with Russian messaging that Western values are hypocritical.

Sanctions and Diplomacy: Although the Trump administration did implement new sanctions on Russia (largely mandated by near-unanimous Congress votes), Trump personally showed reluctance. He delayed implementing some sanctions and criticized the legislation curbing his ability to unilaterally improve relations with Russia (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference). On multiple occasions, Trump downplayed or ignored Russia’s malign actions: he was slow to criticize Russian cyberattacks and poisonings of dissidents, and he conspicuously defended Putin even when presented with evidence of Russian misdeeds (such as Putin’s denial of election hacking, which Trump claimed to accept over his own intelligence agencies’ conclusions (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO)). In a surreal episode, Trump invited Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and Ambassador Kislyak to the Oval Office in May 2017 – excluding U.S. press but allowing Russian state media to photograph – where he revealed highly classified counterterrorism intelligence to them (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell). U.S. officials were aghast that Trump divulged secret information (about ISIS threats) obtained from an ally. While this may have been reckless rather than malicious, it again uniquely benefited Russia and harmed U.S. interests (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell). Additionally, Trump consistently sought warmer bilateral ties: he congratulated Putin on sham election wins, nostalgically spoke of a grand U.S.-Russia partnership, and eschewed the confrontational stance toward Russia that most in Washington (including in his own Cabinet) thought appropriate. Putin, for his part, publicly complimented Trump’s leadership and policies, a clear sign that the Kremlin approved of Trump’s approach.

In isolation, any one of these policy choices might be explained by Trump’s nonconformist “America First” worldview or a desire to improve relations. However, collectively they paint a picture of U.S. foreign policy tilting toward Russian interests in unprecedented ways. Longtime diplomats struggled to explain why Trump would consistently take Putin-friendly stances that even many in Trump’s party opposed. Former Republican Rep. Tom Rooney, who served on the House Intelligence Committee, noted the pattern bluntly: “I mean, the president’s behavior has been profoundly pro-Russian. There’s no getting around it.” The alignment on issue after issue – NATO, the EU, Ukraine, Syria, election interference narratives – mirrors Moscow’s wish list. It’s exactly what one would expect from a leader subject to Russian influence or even direct guidance.

Takeaway: Trump’s major foreign policy positions often tracked closely with Kremlin interests, weakening U.S. alliances and echoing Russian talking points (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO) (Fiona Hill clashes with GOP over ‘fictional’ Ukraine claims - POLITICO). While Trump argues he was simply being pragmatic or tough on allies, the practical effect was to advance Russia’s strategic objectives (fracturing Western unity, relieving pressure on Russia, and expanding Russian influence). This congruence between Trump’s actions and Putin’s goals is a cornerstone of arguments that Trump may have been compromised or at least unduly swayed by Moscow.

5. Context: How Foreign Compromise Happens

Trump’s pattern of behavior fits, in many respects, the profile of an influenced or compromised individual as understood in the intelligence world. It’s important to note that “compromised asset” can mean different things along a spectrum – from a fully witting agent who knowingly works at a foreign power’s direction, to an unwitting influencer who is manipulated through flattery, favors, or blackmail. Experts often use terms like “agent of influence” or “useful idiot” (the latter a Cold War term for naive figures the Kremlin could exploit without formal recruitment). In assessing Trump’s case, consider the following context from known compromise techniques and historical parallels:

Kompromat & Blackmail: Russian security services (and their Soviet predecessors) have a long tradition of gathering kompromat – compromising material – on influential figures to use as leverage. This can be financial (e.g. evidence of illicit deals or debt), personal (sexual escapades, embarrassing conduct), or legal (proof of crimes). The infamous Steele dossier (compiled by a former MI6 officer) alleged that the Kremlin possessed scandalous personal kompromat on Trump from a 2013 Moscow trip. While those specific claims remain unverified, the broader point stands: if Russia has financial records of dubious Trump business dealings, recordings of private conversations, or knowledge of misconduct, it could leverage that to influence Trump’s decisions. Even the secret 2016 Moscow real estate negotiations – knowledge held by the Kremlin – constituted potential kompromat, as Trump’s denial of any business in Russia was a public lie that Russia could have exposed (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider). Historically, individuals under blackmail influence will exhibit exactly what Trump showed: unexplained deference to the blackmailer and alignment with their interests, even against one’s own or one’s country’s norms.

Flattery, Ego, and Ideology: Not all influence requires blackmail. Sometimes a target is compromised simply through cultivation of their vanity or alignment of worldviews. Putin and Russian interlocutors repeatedly flattered Trump, praising his political acumen and engaging in elaborate personal outreach (for instance, Putin’s agents courted Trump with the Miss Universe pageant opportunity and friendly letters). Former KGB agent Yuri Shvets, involved in Soviet active measures, said Trump was identified early on as an “ideally recruitable” personality – susceptible to praise and lacking deep ideological moorings, thus prone to parroting pro-Russian views if wooed (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times) (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times). Indeed, Trump’s very first significant political expression came shortly after his 1987 Moscow trip: he took out newspaper ads blasting U.S. allies for free-riding on defense – essentially echoing a long-standing Kremlin talking point that the U.S. shouldn’t protect ungrateful allies. Some analysts suspect this was not a coincidence, but an early sign of successful influence on Trump’s views. The cultivation theory posits that Trump may have been guided over decades, knowingly or unknowingly, to adopt positions compatible with Moscow’s agenda, through a mix of business incentives and ego-stroking. This is comparable to historical cases where influential Westerners with no formal ties to Soviet intelligence nevertheless promoted Soviet-friendly policies after being courted (examples range from business magnate Armand Hammer’s dealings with the USSR to certain politicians in Europe who took pro-Russia stances following lucrative business ties). The “useful idiot” phenomenon – wherein a leader genuinely believes he’s acting independently, yet consistently advances another nation’s interest – is a well-documented outcome of such influence operations.

Known Cases of Long-Term Recruitment: The Cold War provides instructive analogies. The Cambridge Five (a spy ring of British elites in the mid-20th century) were recruited in their youth via ideology and personal appeal, and only decades later did their full betrayal become evident. While Trump was never a communist sympathizer, the idea of a slow, patient cultivation is not far-fetched. As noted, former KGB spy Shvets compared the Trump operation to the Cambridge Five in terms of its longevity and impact (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times). Additionally, history shows that foreign intelligence sometimes recruits not spies with secret documents, but influencers: people who can shape policy or public opinion. The USSR targeted businessmen, journalists, and politicians in the West to subtly push narratives beneficial to Moscow. Trump’s blend of media savvy, business ties, and later political power make him a textbook target for such an effort. An example from recent history: Marine Le Pen’s far-right party in France received Russian bank loans, and her platform took notably pro-Kremlin positions – a financial entanglement analogous to the debts or investments Russia might use to sway Trump. Similarly, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder forged a close friendship with Putin and later took lucrative jobs with Russian energy firms, becoming one of Putin’s prominent Western apologists. While not a spy, Schröder is often cited as an “agent of influence” – compromised not by blackmail, but by monetary incentives and personal camaraderie. These cases illustrate the spectrum of compromise: one need not be a secret agent taking orders to effectively serve a foreign power’s interests.

Behavioral Red Flags: Counterintelligence experts look for certain red flags in suspecting compromise. These include: unexplained policy shifts favoring the adversary, extraordinary secrecy or destruction of records around interactions with the adversary, denigration of one’s own institutions (like intelligence agencies) in favor of the adversary’s narrative, and a pattern of lies or obstruction when questioned about the adversary. Trump exhibited all of these. He had numerous off-record meetings/calls with Putin (even confiscating interpreters’ notes in one case), an unusual secrecy that left U.S. officials in the dark. He frequently undermined U.S. intelligence agencies – notably siding with Putin’s denials of election interference over the unanimous conclusion of U.S. analysts (Trump calls Putin 'genius' and 'savvy' for Ukraine invasion - POLITICO). And he stonewalled investigations, refusing to be interviewed by Mueller and attacking officials pursuing the Russia inquiry. Such conduct is consistent with someone who might be hiding compromising relationships. Former CIA Director John Brennan bluntly called Trump’s Helsinki performance “nothing short of treasonous” – an extraordinary claim from a usually cautious official, underscoring how far outside normal behavior Trump had veered by openly deferring to Putin over his own country’s intel.

In sum, the context of known compromise cases and methods suggests that if Trump were in fact compromised, his observed behavior is exactly what one would expect. A combination of financial leverage (loans, business deals), personal blackmail material, and psychological manipulation (flattery and ideological courting) are all tools Russia could have employed. Public evidence shows that Trump had potential exposures in all these areas – deep financial ties, possible kompromat, and ego vulnerabilities – and his actions consistently tracked with having a pro-Russian orientation. While definitive proof of a covert handler-agent relationship is lacking publicly, Trump’s case rings enough familiar bells that many intelligence professionals consider him at least influenced if not outright compromised.

**6. Conclusion: Probability Assessment

Weighing the totality of evidence from 1980 onward, the likelihood that Donald Trump is a compromised asset of Vladimir Putin is substantial. Trump’s persistent pro-Putin praise, extensive Russian financial entanglements, alarming intelligence red flags, pro-Russian policy bent, and alignment with classic compromise patterns all point toward a high probability of undue Russian influence over him. Importantly, “compromised” does not necessarily mean Trump is an official Russian spy; rather, it implies Putin holds sway over Trump – whether through hidden leverage or cultivated affinity – to an abnormal and dangerous degree. Based on publicly available information, a reasonable estimate would be that there is about a 70% probability that Trump has been compromised by Putin’s Russia. This percentage reflects a more-likely-than-not assessment given the evidence. It is not 100% because, in fairness, no incontrovertible “smoking gun” document or confession has emerged to confirm Trump is an agent. There are also alternative explanations (for instance, Trump’s behavior could stem from his genuine beliefs or financial self-interest rather than direct Kremlin coercion). However, the convergence of so many indicators of influence – unprecedented in any other U.S. president – makes a compromise scenario highly plausible. Senior FBI counterintelligence officials apparently thought the possibility serious enough to investigate the sitting president (FBI Officials Probed Whether Trump Was ‘Working for Russia’), and numerous members of Congress and intelligence veterans have voiced the same concern in various terms.

In the end, the circumstantial evidence of a compromised relationship is compelling. Donald Trump’s own actions consistently benefited Vladimir Putin, often at the expense of U.S. interests, and he has gone to great lengths to defend and please the Russian leader. While only a full release of classified counterintelligence findings (or a future insider revelation) could raise certainty further, the public record alone justifies profound unease. Thus, our assessment – with an estimated 70% probability – is that Trump has been, wittingly or unwittingly, acting under significant Russian influence, effectively making him a compromised asset of Putin. This conclusion is drawn from the weight of documented evidence and expert analysis, which together portray an American leader uniquely susceptible to the sway of a foreign adversary.

Sources: Public reports and documents including Trump’s interviews and tweets (Trump readies for his turn with Putin – POLITICO) (Trump defends Putin, says U.S. has 'a lot of killers' - POLITICO), Congressional archives (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell) (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference), investigative journalism (Reuters, Washington Post, Politico, etc.) on Trump’s Russia business ties (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider) (Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties | Representative Swalwell), U.S. intelligence assessments (), Special Counsel and Senate findings (Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference) (Trump-Russia Business Ties and Financial Dealings - Business Insider), and expert commentary from ex-intelligence officials (Trump as a Russian Target - Through the Eyes of a former CIA Russian Expert) and former KGB agents (‘Donald Trump recruited by Moscow in 1980s’, claims ex-KGB officer: Report | World News - Hindustan Times). All evidence cited herein is publicly available and has been carefully referenced to support this analysis.

 

Powiem tak, lekko smiechlem. 

Edytowane 5 Marca przez offensive

[voltq 1 372]

To jednak Żeleński odda surowce surowce Europie czy USA? 

Teren pójdzie do Rosji, a co dostanie bezcenny Izrael?

[GordonLameman 8 496]

17 minut temu, voltq napisał(a):

 

Teren pójdzie do Rosji, a co dostanie bezcenny Izrael?

Damy im Ciebie.

[trepek 1 362]

Niech stracimy  

[Henryk Nowak 1 929]

23 minuty temu, GordonLameman napisał(a):

Damy im Ciebie.

Lepiej nie, bo odpowiedź może być miażdżąca. 

[Kris194 4 725]

1 godzinę temu, Lypton napisał(a):

Sztuczna Inteligencja Elona Muska wyliczyła, że Trump na 80% jest ruskim agentem.🤡

 

https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1897078971784974711

 

 

To teraz czekamy aż to Elon też ocenzuruje  

[TheMr. 2 611]

 

 

 

 

 

Do knagi. Bardziej się chyba nie da. 

Edytowane 5 Marca przez TheMr.

[nemar 190]

No to Ukraina traci właśnie swoją chyba ostatnią olbrzymią przewagę nad Rosją :(. Cóż, może to będzie tylko chwilowe. A może dotyczy tylko wywiadu CIA? Wtedy nie byłoby za bardzo bolesne.

[TheMr. 2 611]

Dotyczy wszystkiego. I to w momencie kiedy Rosjna zaczyna wysyłać po 180 dronów dziennie, a ma zamiar po 250-300 miesięcznie. Droga do pokoju to według administracji Trumpa to poddanie się

 

https://x.com/WarNewsPL1/status/1897287769770352914

https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1897317667356483727

 

Twitter, 90% linków się nie wkleja jakimś cudem  

Edytowane 5 Marca przez TheMr.

[hwdp43 1 712]

Wkleja

[TheMr. 2 611]

No to nieźle, mi nie wkleja  

"Nie można osadzić odnośnika, ponieważ: podany URL nie zawiera tweet"  

No, za 50 razem wkleiło się  

 

 

Edytowane 5 Marca przez TheMr.